In today’s business world, accurate and efficient financial reporting is critical. SAP S/4HANA Group Reporting provides a powerful solution for consolidating and reporting financial data. An important aspect of this process is realignment, which ensures that all data is accurate and consistent so that it can be integrated from S/4HANA into Group Reporting. In this blog post, we will look at the key points of realignment, common errors and their solutions, as well as best practices and recommendations for users.

Basics of the realignment

Realignment in SAP S/4HANA Group Reporting aims to ensure the correctness and consistency of all financial data. Relevant information such as company, consolidation unit, partner consolidation unit, consolidation chart of accounts, items, sub-item categories and sub-items are derived and saved during posting in Accounting. The realignment run should be performed in certain cases, e.g. if a derivation rule for the Group Reporting preparation ledger has been changed or if the preparation ledger has been started after some FI postings.

Common errors during the Realignment run

Various errors can occur during the realignment run, which can affect the accuracy and consistency of the financial data:

• Missing document type: A common error is the error message “Document type does not exist”. This error can occur if the document type is not defined correctly or does not exist in the system.

• Inconsistencies in YTD mode: When executing the Realignment run in Year-to-Date (YTD) mode, inconsistencies may occur due to restrictions.

• Incorrect correction postings: Another common error is that correction postings are not carried out correctly. This is due to incorrectly implemented substitution/validation content.

• Incomplete mapping of master data: To ensure that everything runs smoothly for the realignment of the data and the upcoming data transfer from the Universal Journal, it is important that the accounts are mapped to the consolidation items and that the company is assigned to the consolidation unit.

• Period settings FI/ CO: Closed periods in Finance or Controlling can prevent a realignment, as the relevant periods in which a new derivation is to take place must be open.

• Missing implementation notes: Even in the current highest release status for on-premise, there are restrictions depending on the support package used for the realignment, which can only be remedied by a full implementation of notes.

Solutions for errors in bookings with secondary costs

A specific problem with realignment concerns document type SA, which is used as the default BA in business transaction type GRRA to create the derivation documents. However, this document type cannot deduct postings with secondary costs, which leads to errors if accounts contain postings with secondary costs. There are two possible ways to solve this problem:

1. Extension of voucher type SA to include secondary costs: This would enable voucher type SA to also be able to deduct postings with secondary costs.

2. Creation of a new document type and attachment to the Business Transaction GRRA: This is the solution most often chosen based on experience. A new document type is created that can reverse itself and post secondary costs in the event of a reversal. By creating a separate document type, the documents derived from the system can be clearly identified and traced in the context of the realignment.

Best practices and recommendations

In order to successfully implement the realignment process and avoid common mistakes, the following best practices and recommendations should be observed:

1.Important considerations for implementation: A detailed step-by-step guide to implementing the realignment process is helpful. This guide should include activities such as creating entity codes, assigning entities to entity codes, and setting up ledger fiscal year variants.

2. troubleshooting and support tips: If you have problems with the Realignment run, it is important to contact SAP support and install hotfixes/hints or updates if necessary.

3. recommendations for defining your own document types: It may be useful to define your own document type in order to distinguish realignment postings from real FI/CO postings.

4. implementation and testing of restriction notes: Known restrictions and errors that occur can be rectified by adding notes. The respective release status and the support package determine the extent to which notes need to be implemented. SAP provides a complete list with all relevant notes for the realignment and the associated derivation context. This can be checked via the system using the Note Analyzer in order to implement any missing notes.

Conclusion

Realignment in SAP S/4HANA Group Reporting is a critical process to ensure the accuracy and consistency of financial data. By following the above best practices and recommendations, common errors can be avoided and the realignment process can be made efficient. Careful implementation and regular review are crucial to achieve the best possible results from the integration between S/4HANA and Group Reporting.

Do you have any questions about SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting or would you like an initial consultation with our experts? Arrange a free initial consultation.